| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
msmobiles.com_robot
Joined: 23 Mar 2004
Posts: 16777215
|
 Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 5:33 am Post subject: ActiveSync 4.2 Beta Preview released by Microsoft |
 |
|
In the next version of Windows XP, to be called "Windows Vista" there will be no ActiveSync (synchronization software for Windows Mobile) at all and it will be integrated into the OS, but in meantime Microsoft is ...
Read more at http://www.msmobiles.com/news.php/5155.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
clublander
Joined: 21 Nov 2005
Posts: 48
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 8:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Please note: still ActiveSync synchronization over Wi-Fi is not possible - also in 4.2 - and nobody at Microsoft has been fired for this (or other) mistake. |
get over it you sad twat. still pissy because Microsoft think your an annoying pointless wanker? Thats one thing they DID get right then eh? No MVP for you. Shame. grow up. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
schriss
Joined: 07 Apr 2004
Posts: 93
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 11:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
I am grown up and I won't comment on the useless post above, I "get over it"
BUT
as a user, I state that I need ActiveSync over WiFi, "not secure" is not excuse, it's my business to secure my own network. They could put a disclaimer when WiFi sync is activated. Maybe they can't get over some problems they encountered. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
guttrhead
Joined: 29 Sep 2004
Posts: 30
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 1:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| clublander wrote: | | get over it you sad twat. still pissy because Microsoft think your an annoying pointless wanker? Thats one thing they DID get right then eh? No MVP for you. Shame. grow up. |
Wow, someone put on his sassy pants today. It was stupid for Microsoft to drop Wifi sync. I think everyone agrees with that. At least make a version that supports it and one that doesnt, or let it be completely disabled during installation. Don't take the functionality away from everyone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
clublander
Joined: 21 Nov 2005
Posts: 48
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 3:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| oh I agree wifi should still be available, but the constantly wanky comments about sacking people, from this site is pathetic, immature, and pointless. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ebeneezer
Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Posts: 1
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 6:26 pm Post subject: Activesync WiFi |
|
|
| I may be missing something, but I have been using Activesync on my NDA Vario via my WiFI network to sync my MDA Vario with Exchange Server. Which bit of WiFi Activesync doesn't work? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
EJR
Joined: 18 Mar 2004
Posts: 2629
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 7:14 pm Post subject: Re: Activesync WiFi |
|
|
| ebeneezer wrote: | | I may be missing something, but I have been using Activesync on my NDA Vario via my WiFI network to sync my MDA Vario with Exchange Server. Which bit of WiFi Activesync doesn't work? |
in WM2003 you didn't need Exchange Server to synch to your PC with ActiveSync, in WM5 this feature was removed instead of being just "disabled by default" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
scoobydooby
Joined: 15 Mar 2006
Posts: 18
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 10:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| clublander wrote: | | oh I agree wifi should still be available, but the constantly wanky comments about sacking people, from this site is pathetic, immature, and pointless. |
And your first post in this thread was not pathetic? It was mature? And it had a point?
It WAS a big mistake for them to remove that feature, it WAS a mistake worthy of firing the entire development team over.
Someone got lazy, and instead of developing a simple security protocol they just yanked the whole damn feature.
Fire them all I say. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
