msmobiles.com/f Forum Index msmobiles.com/f
dicussions about Microsoft Smartphone and Pocket PC phone
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


Do not buy Orange SPV C500, because...
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    msmobiles.com/f Forum Index -> Discussion of mobile Windows news items
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
msmobiles.com_robot



Joined: 23 Mar 2004
Posts: 16777215

PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2004 5:12 am    Post subject: Do not buy Orange SPV C500, because... Reply with quote

Well, Orange SPV C500 is a fantastic phone - it's tiny, very fast, with good quality of voice phone calls and generally, so apart from the lack of GSM850 band (that is used anyway only in USA), it seems to be perfe...

Read more at http://msmobiles.com/news.php/2984.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The PocketTV Team



Joined: 28 Mar 2004
Posts: 51
Location: San Francisco, CA

PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well apparently the good news is that Orange is aware of the problem and working on a fix.

The bad news is that the fix will probably require a firmware upgrade (I doubt they will be able to fix that OTA with provisionning).

OTA = Over The Air (i.e. remotely, without any user interaction)

provisionning = some "magic" XML code used to change the configuration of Smartphones remotely


Last edited by The PocketTV Team on Mon Aug 23, 2004 2:52 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
schriss



Joined: 07 Apr 2004
Posts: 93
Location: Poland

PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2004 11:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

OK, they will fix GAPI, but cursor keys that are hardly usable for gaming AND SD card hidden under the battery (eliminating hot swap, something I do all the time, swapping SD between Mio8390 and Axim X30) disqualifies this phone in my eyes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The PocketTV Team



Joined: 28 Mar 2004
Posts: 51
Location: San Francisco, CA

PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2004 11:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

schriss wrote:
SD card hidden under the battery

WHAT ???

That's really something stupid!

Who could take such an idiotic design decision ???

I always keep exchanging SD cards between Smartphone's and Pocket PC's (and sometimes, camera).

It much worse that the x30's speaker totally covered when the device is in the cradle.

I can't believe how big and reputable companies sometimes make so poor design choices.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
schriss



Joined: 07 Apr 2004
Posts: 93
Location: Poland

PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2004 12:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

YES, this is insane but true. See for yourself:
http://www.coolsmartphone.com/index.php?option=articles&task=viewarticle&artid=339

"The battery is made by Samsung and is a tiny little thing. It slots in easy enough and covers the MiniSD and SIM card." Confused
Someone was even praising this solution "you can't loose your SD this way" Confused

And here:
http://msmobiles.com/news.php/2944.html
"That's right, it's Mini SD, so get ready to throw away your current SD cards, and take off the battery when you want to change card!"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TANKERx



Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 76

PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2004 1:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh dear oh dear! That was kept nice and quiet wasn't it! And after Nokia getting absolutely slated for making such a dumb decision, no wonder the Microsoft Village wanted to keep it quiet.

Says it all really.

Rolling Eyes
_________________
________________________

HELLO KITTY!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
The PocketTV Team



Joined: 28 Mar 2004
Posts: 51
Location: San Francisco, CA

PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2004 1:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

> Someone was even praising this solution "you can't loose your SD this way" Confused

Then a clever little lock would have been a better idea!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
iraqigeek



Joined: 15 Aug 2004
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2004 2:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

When are the people in this site going to make their minds???

First, the MPx220 was the smartphone to buy, then the C500 was the one, and now the C500 the first item on your "not to buy" list.

Can the writers for this site make their minds, or stop making such allegations???

Since when was a buggy firmware (for which a fix is a work in progress) a primary factor on which to decide which phone to buy? The AT&T MPx200 had firmware problems, but that didn't seem to matter to a lot of people when deciding which phone to use.

I don't know how you people think. All the specifications and capabilites (like camera resolution, screen type/quality/size, expandability, other integrated features like bluetooth) of a given device don't seem to make a difference, only the tiny meaning less things seem to be the major factors when deciding which product is better than which.

The MPx220 was disqualified from your list because of the flashROM it used, even though that wouldn't mean any noticable difference in real life (did anyone on this site made a benchmark, real test on which the C500 was noticably faster than the C500? I doubt they did). The C500 was not the smartphone to buy because of some bugs in its GAPIs (Even though the phone has been released just about one week ago).

As long as the manufacturer or operator/distributor is aware of the problem, and publicly statng that they are working on a fix, I don't see where the big problem is. Also, is it an Orange specific problem? or a problem in the generic HTC firmware of smartphone OS? No one seems to mention that Confused
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The PocketTV Team



Joined: 28 Mar 2004
Posts: 51
Location: San Francisco, CA

PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2004 2:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Even if they comeup with a firmware fix, how many users will install it ? 3% ? 5% ? at best...

If they already have zillion devices in boxes that have been chipped, you can bet that the vast majority of them won't get the fix.

The fix will improve things when they start shipping a new batch with the fixed firmware.

Only a few hackers, gamers, and power-users will install the fix, unless the bug is a total show-stopper.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
schriss



Joined: 07 Apr 2004
Posts: 93
Location: Poland

PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2004 2:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Agree. By the way, I'm not associated with msmobiles.

and who's talking about ROM? I said: "they will fix GAPI" because I believe they will, sooner or later, just like it was possible to fix GAPI for Mio8390 and it will be up to the user - install or not.

I personally don't like C500 because of its hardly usable cursor keys and SD slot hidden under the battery.
Not to mention I prefer clamshell design, especially silver Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The PocketTV Team



Joined: 28 Mar 2004
Posts: 51
Location: San Francisco, CA

PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2004 2:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

> I personally don't like C500 because of its hardly usable cursor keys and SD slot hidden under the battery.

Not SD. Mini-SD!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
schriss



Joined: 07 Apr 2004
Posts: 93
Location: Poland

PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2004 5:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

> Not SD. Mini-SD!
Yes, I know. It makes it even worse. Like AGP 8x - useless, just to make us throw more money away.

By the way, SPV C500 users could evaluate usefulness of Picard's GAPI2GDI wrapper... might be temporary solution for C500 as well.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The PocketTV Team



Joined: 28 Mar 2004
Posts: 51
Location: San Francisco, CA

PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2004 5:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

schriss wrote:
> Not SD. Mini-SD!
Yes, I know. It makes it even worse. Like AGP 8x - useless, just to make us throw more money away.

By the way, SPV C500 users could evaluate usefulness of Picard's GAPI2GDI wrapper... might be temporary solution for C500 as well.

No need, the workaround is simpler.

Requires apps to be slightly modified, unfortunately...

see
http://www.modaco.com/viewtopic.php?p=438404#438404
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
schriss



Joined: 07 Apr 2004
Posts: 93
Location: Poland

PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2004 5:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cool.
Now if only someone cares to make a gx.dll that does that on the fly for existing software... Very Happy Or still, GAPI2GDI could be used for not patched, existing software.
This is crazy, special ver for Mio, special ver for C500...
where is this all heading?? Nobody learns on Mitac's mistakes... Laughing
Lets hope the C500 is the last Smartphone with broken GAPI.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The PocketTV Team



Joined: 28 Mar 2004
Posts: 51
Location: San Francisco, CA

PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2004 5:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

schriss wrote:
Cool.
Now if only someone cares to make a gx.dll that does that on the fly for existing software... Very Happy Or still, GAPI2GDI could be used for not patched, existing software.
This is crazy, special ver for Mio, special ver for C500...
where is this all heading?? Nobody learns on Mitac's mistakes... Laughing
Lets hope the C500 is the last Smartphone with broken GAPI.

No, it won't be the last, I'me ready to bet on that!

GAPI2GDI would not be a good idea in this case. Why revert to DGI when you can use the real raw frame buffer ? It would be much better to make a patched gx.dll that does just the right thing. The raw frame buffer is not protected, so it should be possible to make a patched gx.dll. I'm sure Picard can do that. On the mio 8390, the situation was different, you cannot access the raw frame buffer without the provilege cert. Not the case with the C500.

As for us, since the workaround was so simple to implement, we don't need a patched gx.dll!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    msmobiles.com/f Forum Index -> Discussion of mobile Windows news items All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


please ask us questions - leave them at our Skype Voicemail! Answers: in Podcasts!
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
Windows Mobile news | Mobius